Faces are a rich source of information, signalling a person's
identity, their emotional state, age, sex, ethnicity, health, and
attractiveness.

Faces are
fascinating to most people, because they are so rich in social
information. They signal a
person’s identity, feelings, age, sex, ethnicity and attractiveness. How do we read all this
information in faces? And
how does this information guide our interactions with others? In the Facelab, we are studying
perceptual, cognitive, neural, evolutionary and social aspects of face
processing. Current projects
are concentrated in three main areas:
Attractiveness: Adaptive Significance and
Cognitive Mechanisms
We are investigating what makes faces and
bodies attractive and how our perceptions of beauty may have been shaped
by human evolutionary history.
We aim to determine whether preferences for averageness, symmetry
and sexual dimorphism are biologically based standards of beauty and
whether cognitive mechanisms might also contribute to them. We are also investigating whether
attractive traits reflect aspects of mate quality, such as health,
fertility and genetic diversity.
Face
Expertise and the Other-Race Effect
We are
all face experts, with a remarkable ability to distinguish thousands of
faces, despite their similarity as visual patterns. However, we are more expert
with some faces than others.
For example, people often lack expertise with other-race faces and
find them difficult to recognize.
We are currently studying the perceptual, cognitive and
motivational bases of this well-known other-race effect. We are also studying how people
acquire expertise with other-race faces when they move to a new country.
Applying the Psychologist's Microelectrode
to High-Level Vision: Face
aftereffects reveal face coding mechanisms
Aftereffects
have been called the psychologist’s microelectrode because they can
reveal perceptual coding mechanisms. Recently, a variety of aftereffects have been
discovered in the perception of faces and bodies. For example, briefly viewing a
face biases us to see the opposite characteristics in subsequently viewed
faces, suggesting that a face’s appearance is coded as deviations from an
average face or norm.
Viewing consistently distorted faces rapidly changes what looks
normal and attractive, suggesting that face norms are continuously updated
by the diet of faces that we see. Similar aftereffects have been found in
the perception of body norms and ideals. We are currently using these aftereffects to explore
how we perceive and respond to faces and bodies.
*FACELAB DATABASE link*
Please seek permission from Gill
Rhodes before using these faces
For further information please
contact:
Professor Gill Rhodes
School of Psychology
University of Western Australia, Crawley,
WA 6009
phone: 61 8 6488 3251
fax: 61 8 6488 1006
gill@psy.uwa.edu.au